Venue: Council Chamber - South Cambs Hall. View directions
Contact: Ian Senior, 03450 450 500 Email: democratic.services@scambs.gov.uk Members of the public wishing to speak at this meeting are requested to contact the Support Officer by no later than noon on Monday before the meeting. A public speaking protocol applies.
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies To receive apologies for absence from committee members. Minutes: Councillors Kevin Cuffley and Des O’Brien sent Apologies for Absence. Councillors Charles Nightingale and Alex Riley were their respective substitutes. |
|
Declarations of Interest
1. Disclosable pecuniary interests (“DPI”) A DPI is where a committee member or his/her spouse or partner has any kind of beneficial interest in the land under consideration at the meeting.
2. Non-disclosable pecuniary interests These are interests that are pecuniary involving a personal financial benefit or detriment but do not come within the definition of a DPI. An example would be where a member of their family/close friend (who is not their spouse or partner) has such an interest.
3. Non-pecuniary interests Where the interest is not one which involves any personal financial benefit or detriment to the Councillor but arises out of a close connection with someone or some body /association. An example would be membership of a sports committee/ membership of another council which is involved in the matter under consideration. Minutes: Councillor John Batchelor declared a non-pecuniary interest in respect of Minute 7 (S/3543/16/FL - Great Abington (Land to South of Linton Road)). As Chairman of the Governors of Linton Village College, Councillor Batchelor had been involved in discussions with the County Education Authorities over the formula applied to establish the student capacity of Linton Village College, and had raised objections to the lack of any request for Section 106 monies for secondary education. He was considering the matter afresh.'
|
|
Minutes of Previous Meeting To authorise the Chairman to sign the Minutes of the meeting held on 6 September 2017 as a correct record.
To follow Additional documents: Minutes: The Committee authorised the #chairman to sign, as a correct record, the Minutes of the meeting held on 6 September 2017. |
|
S/2407/17/DC - Longstanton (Northstowe Phase 2) PDF 461 KB
Discharge of condition no.9 (Design Code) of planning permission S/2011/14/OL - Design code for phase 2 of Northstowe .
Appendices B, C and D are available online by visiting www.scambs.gov.uk > The Council > Councillors, Minutes and agendas, and browse. Additional documents:
Decision: The Committee discharged Condition 9 (Design Code) attached to planning permission S/2011/14/OL (Northstowe Phase 2). Minutes: The Case Officer summarised the background, and emphasised the importance of the Phase 2 Design Guide, which had been developed taking into account the Design Guide for Phase 1, thus ensuring a level of consistency.
The Team Leader (Consultancy Unit) made a PowerPoint presentation, which covered the following topics:
· Planning context · Northstowe Phase 1 delivery · What are Design Codes? · Urban design framework · Movement framework · Landscape structure · Character areas · Northstowe Fields character area · Town centre character area · Landscape strategy · Site wide coding · Town centre Square · Landscape and open space parameter plan · Movement and access · Density parameter plan · Heights parameter plan
Dean Harris (for the applicants) set out the Housing and Communities Agency’s priorities, which were speed of delivery, housing choice, and quality of place. Councillor Alex Riley (speaking as a Committee member) expressed disappointment that the Design Code had not addressed the issue of minimum room sizes. In reply, Mr. Harris said that the Government now only required this if minimum room sizes formed part of the Local Plan. Minimum room sizes had not been specified in the outline planning permission for Phase 2, but could could be a consideration as part of Phase 3, should the draft Local Plan have been adopted by then.
A representative from Longstanton Parish Council was in the public gallery, but opted not to address the Committee. He confirmed that the Parish Council considered that Condition 9 had been complied with satisfactorily.
Speaking as the local Member, Councillor Riley acknowledged the Design Code as an impressive document, but cautioned against becoming too prescriptive. He regretted that the document did not specify minimum room sizes. He wondered how the character of Long Lane would be protected. Other important elements were delivery of a secondary school, the date of the first house completion, and the build-out timescale. The Northstowe Transport Planning Officer said that Long Lane would acquire an enhanced function as a cycle way, but that its essential character would be preserved. Councillor Riley feared that Long Lane might be damaged by the use of Quad bikes. The New Communities Team Leader said that the secondary school was due in September 2019, and that the first house completion was expected six months before that.
Councillor Riley asked how construction vehicles would access the site. The case officer informed the Committee that delivery routes would be agreed between South Cambridgeshire District Council and the HCA, and indentified in an Environmental Management Plan. The Access Road West would not be ready in time for the first construction project, but the case officer assured Members that Longstanton Parish Council would be consulted before routes were agreed.
Councillor Sebastian Kindersley noted that the indicative drawings showed balconies on flats, and commented that such balconies were not a traditional feature in South Cambridgeshire. In response, the Team Leader (Consultancy Unit) referred to Section 4.5 of the Northstowe Phase 2 Design Code. That section was clear that one of the essential design principles was that all proposals must provide external space. In ... view the full minutes text for item 4. |
|
S/2790/17/FL - Great Eversden (28 High Street) PDF 145 KB
Side and Rear Two Storey Extension Additional documents: Decision: The ctee approved the application, subject to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development. Minutes: The Committee approved the application, subject to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development. |
|
S/2383/17/FL - Over (Site adjacent Longstanton Road) PDF 379 KB
The erection of 26 dwellings, (including 10 affordable units), together with ancillary access arrangements and landscaping Additional documents:
Decision: The Committee approved the application subject to
1. The prior completion of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 securing the matters referred to the Heads of Terms attached at Appendix 1 to the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development; and 2. The Conditions set out in Appendix 2 to the said report. Minutes: Members visited the site on 3 October 2017.
he case officer summarised discussions that had taken place about ongoing maintenance of the drainage system.
Don Proctor (applicant’s agent) addressed the meeting. He commended the application as policy compliant, and said that the draft Conditions and Section 106 Agreement had both been agreed. Mr. Proctor would be happy to discuss with officers the maintenance of the drainage ditches.
Councillor Brian Burling secured a commitment from officers that Over Parish Council would be consulted about drainage measures. In response to his plea that the affoong be ‘pepperpotted’ throughout the development, the case officer said that the Registered Provider would prefer to group them so as to facilitate more efficient management.
Councillor Sebastian Kindersley said that the proposal should be approved for three reasons, namely · It was a Full application · It had the support of Over Parish Council · It had local Members’ support
The Development Management Project Implementation Officer reminded the Committee that the five-year housing land supply at the time of considering the application was the appropriate status to take into account.
The Committee approved the application subject to
1. The prior completion of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 securing the matters referred to the Heads of Terms attached at Appendix 1 to the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development; and
2. The Conditions set out in Appendix 2 to the said report. |
|
S/3543/16/FL - Great Abington (Land To South of Linton Road) PDF 582 KB
Full application for 45 dwellings, community orchard and children's play area Additional documents:
Decision: The Committee approved the application subject to
1. The prior completion of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 securing the matters referred to the Heads of Terms attached at Appendix 1 to the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development; and 2. The draft Conditions set out in Appendix 2 to the said report. Minutes: Members visited the site on 3 October 2017.
The case officer corrected a mistake in Appendix 1 to the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development. The affordable housing percentage of 40% equated to 18 affordable dwellings, not 21.
Glyn Mutton (for the applicant) and Councillor Tony Orgee (local Member) addressed the meeting. Mr. Mutton outlined the measures taken to mitigate any impact on the proposed development from Westlodge Kennels. Councillor Orgee said there was substantial local support for the proposal. However, Councillor Orgee profoundly disagreed with Cambridgeshire County Council’s assertion that the primary school had sufficient capacity to cope with the increased intake of students likely to come from the development. Hence, in his view, the County Council had missed the opportunity for section 106 funding for the primary school. Councillor John Batchelor shared this concern in relation to secondary education.
The Committee approved the application subject to
1. The prior completion of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 securing the matters referred to the Heads of Terms attached at Appendix 1 to the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development, subject to an amendment requiring 18 of the 45 dwellings to be affordable rather than 21;
2. The prior approval of the County Council Archaeology department to the investigation details; and
3. The draft Conditions set out in Appendix 2 to the said report. |
|
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee received and noted an Update on enforcement action.
In respect of Smithy Fen, Cottenham (paragraph 5(b)), the Principal Planning Enforcement Officer said that ten prosecution files had been forwarded to the 3C Legal Shared Service for processing.
In respect of the Oaks, Meadow Road, Willingham (paragraph 5(g)), the Principal Planning Enforcement Officer said that the Appeal had now been rearranged, and allocated three days, starting on 17 October 2017. |
|
Appeals against Planning Decisions and Enforcement Action
Report to follow Additional documents:
Minutes: The Committee received and noted a report on appeals against planning decisions and enforcement action.
Members engaged in debate about, among other things: · Appeals against the non-determination of applications delegated to officers · The delay in issuing decision notices · Delegation in general
Councillor Deborah Roberts asked officers to report to the next Planning Committee meeting the percentage of delegation requests being sent to Committee for determination by Members. The Development Management Project Implementation Officer explained how the Council’s scheme of delegation worked. Councillor Robert Turner, speaking as Planning Portfolio Holder, said that steps were being taken to review the scheme in due course.
Councillor Roberts suggested that training be provided for Parish Councils, reminding them about the mechanics of the scheme of delegation operated by South Cambridgeshire District Council. The Vice-Chairman said that such information was available from other sources.
|