The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions and Informatives set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
Members noted that this application had been withdrawn from the agenda.
The Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director. Members agreed the reasons for refusal as being the scale and design of the proposal, which neither preserved nor enhanced the Conservation Area. The proposal therefore contravened Policy CH/5 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework 2007.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application, subject to the prior completion of a Section 106 Legal Agreement and the Conditions referred to in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application, subject to the Local Planning Authority being satisfied with the routing of construction traffic, the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities), and comments awaited from, and relevant Conditions proposed by, the Acting Corporate Manager (Health and Environmental Services).
Withdrawn from the agenda
The Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities). Reason for refusal: Members considered that, by virtue of the building’s scale, and in the absence of sufficient evidence of its need such as might justify approval under Policy GB/1 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework 2007 (as well as national guidance), the proposal would represent inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
The Committee deferred the application to give the applicant a further opportunity to provide evidence of any special circumstances giving rise to the need for the proposed building in the Green Belt.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application, as amended by plans date stamped 18 November 2009, subject to additional detailing for plots 6-9.
The Committee approved the application, as amended on 16 November 2009, subject to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities).
The Committee approved the application, as amended by drawing 09/34:P/02B (date stamped 2November 2009), subject to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities).
Approved as report.
Refusal of both applications, contrary to report, on the ground of adverse impact on the Conservation Area.
Delegated approval / refusal, subject to formal comments from the Local Highways Authority on on-site parking.
Delegated approval / refusal for the reasons set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities), subject to the Conditions referred to therein.
Delegated approval / delegated refusal for the reasons set out in the report from Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities), subject to the re-arrangement of parking facilities and the Conditions referred to in the report.
Approved as report.
Approval for the reasons set out in the report from the Director of Development Services, subject to the Conditions referred to therein.
REFUSED
Delegated Refusal/Delegated approval, subject to the Trees and Landscape Officer being satisfied that the walnut tree can be safeguarded. Reasons: need to preserve character of the area.
Agreed
Approval as report
Delegated approval, subject to amended plans to revise appearance of windows to rear and a plain door entrance on the front.
Delegated approval as report, subject to dwellings being set back and provision of 3 parking spaces on each plot.
Approval as report
Delegated Approval
Refusal contrary to report
Approval
Approval