Issue - decisions

LITLINGTON: Planning Applications

13/02/2018 - S/2927/17/FL - Litlington (Sheen Farm, Royston Road)

The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application subject to:

 

1.     the prior completion of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (or as otherwise deemed appropriate) securing those contributions set out in Appendix 1 to the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development, final wording being delegated to officers in consultation with the Chairman and Vice Chairman of the Planning Committee; and

 

2.     the Conditions and Informative set out in the said report.


03/07/2015 - S/0400/15/FL - Litlington (Highfield Farm, Royston Road)

The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application, subject to

1.     The Council’s Environmental Health Officer being satisfied that meteorological data source used by the applicant is appropriate

2.     Satisfactory comments being received from the other local authorities in whose areas the applicant already has facilities

3.     The Conditions referred to in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director

4.     extra Conditions requiring monitoring, and that the number of containerised power generation sets should not be increased from eight without the submission and approval of a new planning application.


07/02/2014 - S/0439/12/FL - Litlington (Land at Highfield Farm, West of Royston Road)

The Committee refused the application for the reasons set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.


09/11/2012 - S/0702/12/FL - Litlington (Horse & Groom, Baldock Road)

The Committee refused the application for the reasons set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director, with two small amendments: in Reason 1, the word ‘approved’ should be replaced with the word ‘existing’ so that Reason 1 states as follows, ‘The scheme proposes redevelopment of the entire site and the floor area is proposed to be nearly 11 times bigger than that originally existing under S/0509/09/F…..’ and in Reason 4 (fourth sentence) the word ‘design should be included so that it states, ‘However, it is considered that due to its design, location, size and scale, the development will have a significantly adverse impact on the surrounding landscape.’


10/04/2012 - S/0016/12/FL - Litlington (Land Adj 1 The Mount)

The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).


07/12/2005 - S/1341/03/F - LITLINGTON

APPROVE


25/10/2005 - S/1630/05/F - LITLINGTON

Approval as report. 


02/12/2004 - S/2153/04/F - Litlington

Refusal contrary to report, and resolved to take enforcement action.