The Committee unanimously approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development.
The Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development. Members agreed the reasons for refusal as being
· The absence of very special circumstances such as would overcome the inappropriateness of development in the Green Belt
· The impact on the character and openness of that Green Belt
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application subject to
1. expiry of the public consultation process and there being no new material objections raised;
2. The Conditions and Informatives referred to in the report from the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development, final wording to be agreed by officers in consultation with the Chairman and Vice-Chairman of the Planning Committee; and
3. Referral of the decision to the Secretary of State
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application subject to
1. The prior completion of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 securing financial contributions towards Health care, recreation extension, Dovecote benches, onsite open space, monitoring, household waste bins, expansion of the footpath and the ecology corridor, as detailed in Appendix 2 to the report from the Head of Development Management;
2. The Conditions and Informatives referred to in the said report; and
3. Two additional Conditions requiring the access to be implemented in accordance with the agreed details, and the provision of details for the management of the road in the event of it not being adopted.
The Committee refused the application for the reasons set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee refused for the reasons set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director. Members asked that more substance be given to both reasons to reflect concerns raised by them in relation to the impact of development on the character of this part of the village, including that its Group Village status is reflected by the current visual character of this part of the village.
The Committee gave officers delegated authority to approve the application, subject to:
1. The prior completion of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 securing financial contributions towards public open space and community facilities, and the affordable gousing in perpetuity;
2. Outstanding comments from, and any further work required by, Cambridgeshire County Council’s Archaeology Service; and
3. The Conditions referred to in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee approved the application, subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions and Informatives set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee approved the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director. In Members’ opinion, neither the scale nor design of the proposal caused significant harm to the setting of the adjacent Grade II Listed Building. In addition, they did not consider the proposal to be overbearing in relation to 5 Barons Lane. Members concluded therefore that the proposal did not conflict with either Policies CH/4 or DP/3 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework 2007.
The Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director. Members agreed the reasons for refusal as being adverse visual impact on the street scene, impact on the amenity of existing neighbours, highway safety and noise disturbance from the adjacent industrial unit.
Upon the Chairman’s casting vote, the Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee approved the application, upon the Chairman’s casting vote, subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities) and a further Condition requiring the building to remain a separate one-bedroomed dwelling, and not to become an annexe to no. 7 Mortimers Lane.
The Committee approved both applications, subject in each case to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee approved the application subject to a Section 106 Legal Agreement controlling occupancy of the annexe and consequent deletion of Condition 4 in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities).
Refused contrary to officer recommendation on the grounds of the proposal’s height, mass and proximity to the north east and south east boundaries making it overbearing to neighbouring properties at 38 High Street and 10 Edis Way. The application was therefore contrary to policy DP/3 of the Local Development Framework.
Approval as report with revisions to Conditions requiring timber fenestration on the Station Road elevation, a scheme for the relocation of the substation, a scheme for the relocation of the extraction vents before development commences, a method statement for the retention of the Station Road façade and the protection of the wall around the War Memorial.
Approval as report
Approval as report
Approval