By six votes to four, with one member not voting, the Committee voted to Approve the Recommendation, subject to
a) Consultation with and confirmation from the Secretary of State that the application is not to be called in for his determination; and
b) The planning conditions set out in the report; and
c) The three additional conditions:
1. Monitored CCTV installed on the bridge over the A10.
2. A report on crime levels in Milton before and after the station becomes operational
3. The installation of Electric Vehicle charging points, with informatives on additional green energy measures.
(Councillors Henry Batchelor, Peter Fane, Geoff Harvey, Tumi Hawkins, Pippa Heylings and Judith Rippeth voted to approve the application. Councillors Sue Ellington, Deborah Roberts, Heather Williams and Richard Williams voted to refuse. Councillor Martyn Cahn did not vote.)
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions and Informatives set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee deferred the application for a site visit and to allow time to collate further information regarding the living conditions in the portable buildings and the further comments of the Council’s Environmental Health service.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application subject to there being no adverse material comments from consultees and to Conditions referred to in the report and written update from the Planning and New Communities Director and additional Conditions requiring a contaminated land survey, on-site turning provision for vehicles and details of landscaping and fencing. Members did not impose a requirement for a financial contribution towards outdoor play space on this occasion.
The Committee approved the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director. Members agreed the reason for approval as being that the need for additional pitches outweighed any planning harm caused by inappropriate development in the Green Belt. Accordingly, they did not consider there to be any overriding conflict with policies in the South Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework 2007. Members did not impose a requirement for a financial contribution towards outdoor play space or community infrastructure on this occasion.
The Committee approved permanent consent for the application subject to Conditions, including those referred to in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation from the Planning and New Communities Director. Members agreed the reasons for refusal as being insufficient provision for car and bicycle parking, and poor design.
The Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director. Members agreed the reason for refusal as being that the dwelling, by reason of its design, scale and form, would be out of keeping with the character of the area.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities) and an Informative requiring the retention of trees on the application site.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report and update report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities), and to it being referred to the Secretary of State as a departure from the Development Plan and not called in for determination by him.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities), and an additional Condition removing Permitted Development rights for hard standing unless otherwise authorised in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities), Condition 2 being amended to make additional reference to approved plan 22. An Informative would be attached to the Decision Notice seeking to preserve access to the development site in order to maintain utility and drainage pipes serving Pembroke Court.
The Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities). Members agreed the reasons for refusal as being that the proposal was too cramped and was out of keeping with the character and design of Pearson Close.
The Committee approved the application, subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities) and additional Conditions requiring the submission, prior to the commencement of development, of schemes of surface water drainage and hard and soft landscaping.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application, subject to the receipt of comments from Milton Parish Council following its meeting on 7 March 2011, and to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities). Reasons: the danger of setting a precedent were a dayroom of such size and scale to be permitted, and failure by the applicant to demonstrate very special circumstances for an increased size in day room over and above that permitted at Appeal.
The Committee approved the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities), subject to a S.106 Agreement requiring the annexe to be occupied as ancillary accommodation to the main dwelling. Reason for decision: the very special personal circumstances outweighed the inappropriateness of development in the Green Belt as defined in Policy GB/1 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Development Framework 2007.
Delegated approval as report subject to the application not being called in for determination by the Secretary of State.
Withdrawn from the agenda
Delegated approval of the application, as amended, for temporary consent, subject to Conditions and the application not being called in for determination by the Secretary of State.
Approved as report.
Minded to Approve the application, subject to the proposal being advertised as a departure from the Development Plan, referred to the Secretary of State and not being called in by her for determination, for a temporary period of three years, subject also to the submission of satisfactory evidence of the applicants’
Gypsy status, to safeguarding Conditions, and to the Council approaching Anglian Water to explore the potential for providing mains drainage for the significant number of sites approved along Chesterton Fen Road.
(Councillor Mrs DP Roberts was not present in the Chamber when this application was considered and determined.)
Support in principle
Refused, contrary to report. Members agreed the reasons as being the overbearing nature of the extension, given its position and proximity to no. 6 Pearson Close, the adverse effect on neighbours’ amenities and loss of light. Contrary to Policy HG12 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2004.
Approval as report with additional Conditions relating to pollution control and canopy colour
Approval as report with additional Condition removing Permitted Development Rights relating to boundary treatment.
Refused as report on the grounds of the proposal’s poor relationship to Milton (Policy RT1 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2004), the likely increase in traffic, and the proposal’s intrusion into the countryside and a sensitive visual gap in the Green Belt.
Approval as report.
Approval as report
Approval as report