Decisions

All planning applications for Madingley considered by the Planning Committee since May 2003. For individual reports, please click on the `Meetings’ tab above. For further details on all Madingley planning applications, please visit our Planning Applications Database and select Madingley from the drop-down list of parishes.

Councillor Pippa Heylings proposed a Condition requiring retention and maintenance of the hedge along the northern boundary of the proposal site. This proposal was seconded by Councillor Anna Bradnam and, by affirmation, agreed by the Committee with the final wording to be agreed by officers in consultation with the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Planning Committee.

 

Councillor Brian Milnes proposed that Permitted Development Rights Class A (enlargement or improvement of, or alterations to, a house) and Class E (the provision of buildings and other development within the curtilage of a house) be withdrawn. This proposal was seconded by Councillor Deborah Roberts and, upon a vote being conducted by role call, was lost by eight votes to three. Councillors Milnes, Roberts and Heather Williams voted to withdraw Permitted Development Rights. Councillors John Batchelor, Bradnam, Cahn, Ellington, Fane, Heylings, Rippeth and Wright voted against the proposal.

 

Upon a vote being conducted by roll call, and by ten votes to one, the Committee approved the application subject to

 

1.     The Conditions set out in the report from the Joint Director of Planning and Economic Development; and

 

2.     An additional Condition requiring retention and maintenance of the hedge along the northern boundary of the proposal site, with the final wording being agreed by officers in consultation with the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Planning Committee

 

Councillors John Batchelor, Bradnam, Cahn, Ellington, Fane, Heylings, Milnes, Rippeth. Heather Williams and Wright voted to approve the application. Councillor Roberts voted against.

All planning applications for Caldecote considered by the Planning Committee since May 2003. For individual reports, please click on the ‘Meetings’ tab above. For further details on all Caldecote planning applications, please visit our Planning Applications Database and select Caldecote from the drop-down list of parishes.

By affirmation, the Committee gave officers delegated authority

 

1.    to issue a new planning permission conditional on the completion of a Deed of Variation (to attach the Section 106 from the 2017 outline consent to the current Section 73 application); and

 

2.    in order to observe due process, to issue Certificate B and consult upon it for 21 days,

All planning applications for Great Shelford considered by the Planning Committee since May 2003. For individual reports, please click on the “Meetings” tab above. For further details on all Great Shelford planning applications, please visit our Planning Applications Database and select Great Shelford from the drop-down list of parishes.

Councillor Heather Williams proposed that rental of each of the Alms-houses should not exceed 50% of market rent unless South Cambridgeshire District Council agreed otherwise. This was seconded by Councillor Judith Rippeth and, by affirmation, agreed by the Committee.

 

By affirmation, the Committee gave officers delegated authority to approve the application subject to

 

1.     The prior completion of a Legal Agreement under the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to ensure

(A)  That the properties remain affordable in perpetuity and that the rents payable by occupiers of the Alms-houses shall not exceed 50% of market rent unless the charity landlord can satisfy South Cambridgeshire District Council that rents should be raised beyond that figure; and

(B)  The future maintenance and management of various on-site areas of green space and landscaping around the residential development, including the central green space and Local Area of Play.

 

2.     The conditions and informatives set out in the report from the Joint Director of Planning and Economic Development.

 

Although present, Councillor Brian Milnes had missed part of the debate because of technical issues. Therefore he did not vote in relation to either the amendment or the substantive motion.

All planning applications for Girton considered by the Planning Committee since May 2003. For individual reports, please click on the “Meetings” tab above. For further details on all Girton planning applications, please visit our Planning Applications Database and select Girton from the drop-down list of parishes.

By affirmation, the Committee approved the application subject to

 

1.    A Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 securing the tenure and affordability of the housing units; and

 

2.    The Conditions and  Informatives set out in the report from the Joint Director of Planning and Economic Development.

All planning applications for Whittlesford considered by the Planning Committee since May 2003. For individual reports, please click on the ‘Meetings’ tab above. For further details on all Whittlesford planning applications, please visit our Planning Applications Database and select Whittlesford from the drop-down list of parishes

By affirmation, the Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions and Informatives set out in the report from the Joint Director of Planning and Economic Development.

 

Councillors Ellington, Rippeth and Roberts had left the meeting so were not part of the affirmation.

All planning applications for Waterbeach considered by the Planning Committee since May 2003. For individual reports, please click on the ‘Meetings’ tab above. For further details on all Waterbeach planning applications, please visit our Planning Applications Database and select Waterbeach from the drop-down list of parishes

Councillor Deborah Roberts proposed that a decision be deferred until officers had considered the effect of the draft Waterbeach Neighbourhood Plan. This proposal was seconded by Councillor Heather Williams. The Delivery Manager (Strategic Sites) informed Members that the Neighbourhood Plan was still only a pre-submission document and, as such, could not be given any weight. Upon a vote being conducted by roll call, the proposal was defeated by seven votes to four. Councillors Ellington, Roberts, Heather Williams and Wright voted to defer, Councillors John Batchelor, Bradnam, Cahn, Fane, Heylings, Milnes and Rippeth voted against deferral.

 

Upon a vote being conducted by roll call, and by seven votes to nil with four abstentions, the Committee approved the amended Waterbeach New Town West Key Phase 1 Design Code. Councillors John Batchelor, Bradnam, Cahn, Fane, Heylings, Milnes and Rippeth voted to approve the Design Code. Councillors Ellington, Roberts, Heather Williams and Wright abstained.

All planning applications for Fowlmere considered by the Planning Committee since May 2003. For individual reports, please click on the “Meetings” tab above. For further details on all Fowlmere planning applications, please visit our Planning Applications Database and select Fowlmere from the drop-down list of parishes.

Upon a vote being conducted by roll call and by seven votes to three, the Committee refused the application contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Joint Director of Planning and Economic Development. Members agreed that the proposal, by virtue of its mass, scale and overbearing nature, and in conjunction with an existing extension to the garage, would have an unacceptable adverse impact on the amenity of the neighbouring property known as Oakleigh House. The proposal therefore conflicted with Policy HQ/1 of the South Cambridgeshire Local Plan 2019. Final wording of the Decision Notice would be drafted by officers in consultation with the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Planning Committee.

 

Councillors John Batchelor, Cahn and Fane voted to approve the application. Councillors Bradnam, Heylings, Milnes, Rippeth, Roberts, Heather Williams and Wright voted to refuse. Councillor Ellington had left the meeting and did not vote.

The Council at its meeting held on 21 May 2020 approved and adopted the new Constitution of South Cambridgeshire District Council. The Council agreed to authorise the Chief Executive, after consultation with the Chair of the Council, to make any further typographical or minor amendments to the Constitution prior to publication.

 

The Chief Executive, after consultation with the Chair, has now agreed to make the further amendments to the Constitution listed in the appendix to this decision notice, prior to publication. For completeness, the Leader of the Council and Vice-Chair of the Civic Affairs Committee, who also chaired the Constitution Review Task and Finish Group, and the Monitoring Officer were also consulted upon the proposed changes.

Following consultation with the Chair of the Council,  in exercise of the authority delegated by Council at its meeting held on 21 May 2020, the Chief Executive approves the making of the amendments to the Constitution shown in the appendix to this decision notice.

The Council at its meeting held on 21 May 2020 approved and adopted the new Constitution of South Cambridgeshire District Council. The Council agreed to authorise the Chief Executive, after consultation with the Chair of the Council, to make any further typographical or minor amendments to the Constitution prior to publication.

 

The Chief Executive, after consultation with the Chair, has now agreed to make the further amendments to the Constitution listed in the appendix to this decision notice, prior to publication. For completeness, the Leader of the Council and Vice-Chair of the Civic Affairs Committee, who also chaired the Constitution Review Task and Finish Group, and the Monitoring Officer were also consulted upon the proposed changes.

Following consultation with the Chair of the Council,  in exercise of the authority delegated by Council at its meeting held on 21 May 2020, the Chief Executive approves the making of the amendments to the Constitution shown in the appendix to this decision notice.

On 29 May 2020 the Grants Advisory Committee reviewed all Community Chest applications that were deferred from the 24 April meeting as well as all new applications received between 1 March and 31 March 2020.   Following consideration of the applications, the Committee made the following recommendations to the Lead Cabinet Member for Finance:      Applicant Village(s) affected Description Total applied for (£) Total recomm ended (£) Additional conditions/ comments   1   St Catherine’s Parochial Church Council   Litlington   Installation of kitchen and toilet facility   1,000.00   1,000.00     2   Over Sports Club   Over   Verti Draining for the pitch   300.00   Defer   Committee feel there should be some contribution from the Parish Council   3   West Cambridge Christian Youth Ministries   Cambourne, Comberton & surrounding villages   Laptop and pastoral support work   1,000.00   1,000.00     4   Longstanton Cricket Club   Longstanton   To buy an interchangeable Cassette mower       1,000.00   1,000.00     5   Balsham Good Neighbour Scheme   Balsham   To cover initial start-up costs   1,000.00   1,000.00       6   Willingham Bowls Club   Willingham   To purchase a used refurbished lawnmower   1,000.00   1,000.00     7   Comberton Village Squash Club   Comberton   To convert the facility into a modern sports venue   1,000.00   1,000.00     8   Thriplow Society   Thriplow   New projector and carry case   585.98   585.98     9   Cambs College Riding for the Disabled   All of South Cambs   Purchase of horse riding equipment   720.00   720.00     10   Global Learning Idea Exchange   All village schools in the area   The purchase of ‘Hook Cards’   637.68   Defer     Committee would like some more information on this   11   Bottisham Swimming Club   Histon & Impington and Bottisham   Purchase of swimming equipment   1,000.00   Defer   Committee would like some more information on how this equipment will be used and who by   12   CamCare UK   Cambourne, Caldecote, Comberton, Madingley, Bar Hill, Sawston, Ely     Materials to support the Electronics and Robotics club and the Cambourne Science Festival     1,000.00   1,000.00     13   Croydon Reading Rooms   Croydon & surrounding villages   Reading room renovation   1,000.00   1,000.00     14   Great Chishill Windmill Trust   Great & Little Chishill   Internal works to Great Chishill Windmill to improve visitor safety     1,000.00   1,000.00     15   St Mary’s Church   Hardwick & surrounding villages   Fitting out kitchen with white goods in new community hall     1,000.00   1,000.00     16   Fen Drayton Village Hall   Fen Drayton   Replacement of tables   843.00   843.00     17   Swavesey Community Orchard   Swavesey, Over, Fen Drayton, Fenstanton, Northstowe, Longstnaton, Boxworth and Elsworth     Outdoor benches   988.00   988.00       18   South Cambs Ringing Group   Weston Colville, Weston Green, West Wratting, Balsham     Conservation of rare bird species in South Cambs   917.18.00   917.18.00     19   Histon & Impington Archaeology Group   Histon & Impington   To purchase 10 freestanding Display cases     600.00   600.00     20   Meldreth Parish Council   Meldreth   A commemorative bench for VE day   1,000.00   1,000.00     21   Balsham Church Institute   Balsham   A commemorative bench to celebrate VE day   1,000.00   1,000.00     22   Harston Residents Group   Harston   To purchase a remembrance bench to celebrate VE day     800.00   800.00

 

To accept the recommendations of the Grants Advisory Committee (see above).

Purpose

 

1.    The purpose of this report is to consider the conclusions of the Examiner’s Report on the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan, and whether those conclusions should be acted upon and therefore that the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum. This includes considering whether the examiner’s recommended modifications to the Neighbourhood Plan should be made, and whether the Council agrees that the Neighbourhood Plan meets the Basic Conditions.

 

2.    Cabinet agreed at its meeting on 26 July 2018 that where the examiner has concluded that the Neighbourhood Plan is legally compliant, meets the Basic Conditions (with or without modifications), and should proceed to referendum, the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development has delegated authority to make the decision on the way forward, in consultation with the Planning Lead Member.

 

Background

 

3.    The two parishes of Histon and Impington are treated as one community and since 2012 a grouped Parish Council has been in place. Histon & Impington Parish Council decided to prepare a Neighbourhood Plan for this community to provide a more locally focussed set of policies for their parish. An application to designate that part of Histon & Impington north of the A14 of their parish as a Neighbourhood Area was submitted to SCDC in June 2014.  It was considered that the area of Impington south of the A14 had very different needs and requirements which could not successfully be captured in a Neighbourhood Plan covering all parts of the parishes. The Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Area was designated on 9 September 2014.

 

4.    Officers provided informal comments on earlier drafts of the Neighbourhood Plan ahead of the formal pre-submission consultation process.

 

5.    A Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) and Habitats Regulations Assessment (HRA) screening was undertaken on a draft version of the Neighbourhood Plan, and a screening determination was published in October 2018.

 

6.    Pre-submission public consultation on the draft Neighbourhood Plan was undertaken by the Parish Council from 1 October until 16 November 2018. Officers provided a formal response to the consultation, providing constructive comments about the Neighbourhood Plan to assist the neighbourhood plan group with finalising the Neighbourhood Plan.  

 

7.    On 3 June 2019, Histon & Impington Parish Council submitted their Neighbourhood Plan to SCDC having considered the comments received on the pre-submission version and made any necessary changes. . The Neighbourhood Plan included 19 planning policies that cover a range of issues including:

                                  i.    Protecting the essential character of the community

                                ii.    Encouraging the growth and success of the retail, leisure and commercial businesses of the villages;

                               iii.    Ensuring the villages community infrastructure develops and adapts to emerging and changing demographic needs;

                               iv.    Developing a network of sustainable, accessible transport links within and around the villages;

                                v.    Supporting the community in continuing to make the villages safe, secure, supportive and welcoming to all;

                               vi.    Ensuring a sufficient supply of sustainable and high-quality housing within the villages

 

8.    Officers confirmed that the submitted version of the Neighbourhood Plan and its accompanying supporting documents complied with all the relevant statutory requirements at that stage of plan making. Formal public consultation on the submitted Neighbourhood Plan was therefore undertaken between 19 June and 31 July 2019.

 

9.    Officers, in conjunction with Histon & Impington Parish Council, appointed Bob Yuille of Intelligent Plans and examinations (IPe) as the independent examiner[1] to examine the Neighbourhood Plan. On 2 August 2019, the Neighbourhood Plan, its accompanying supporting documents, and all comments submitted on the submission version of the Neighbourhood Plan, were provided to the examiner with a request for him to carry out the examination on the Neighbourhood Plan.

 

10. The examiner issued a series of clarification questions relating to the Neighbourhood Plan on 14 August 2019. He had noted that SCDC had made many representations at the submission consultation stage of the plan and therefore requested that SCDC and Histon & Impington Parish Council should provide him with a Statement of Common Ground (SOCG) which sets out those points on which South Cambridgeshire District Council and Histon & Impington Parish Council have been able to reach agreement and those on which they have not. He had highlighted that it is not part of his role to delve into matters that do not fundamentally affect the Plan’s ability to meet the Basic Conditions. The two councils therefore worked together to provide the examiner with an agreed SOCG.

 

11. Once the responses from both councils were published in early October further correspondence was sent to the examiner from a third party relating to Policy HIM08 The Jam factory.

 

12. Subsequently the examiner asked further questions in clarification letters dated 24 October and 13 December 2019. 

 

13. The Examiner’s Report was received on 9 March 2020 (see Appendix 1). The examiner in his report concludes that subject to a series of recommended modifications the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan meets all the necessary legal requirements and should proceed to referendum. He also recommends that the referendum should be held within the neighbourhood area only.

 

14. Now that the Examiner’s Report has been received, the Council is required to consider the conclusions of the Examiner’s Report, and whether those conclusions should be acted upon and therefore that the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum. This includes considering whether the examiner’s recommended modifications to the Neighbourhood Plan should be made, and whether the Council agrees that the Neighbourhood Plan meets the Basic Conditions. The Council must publish its decision in a decision statement.

 

Considerations

 

15. Where an examiner has concluded that the Neighbourhood Plan meets the Basic Conditions (with or without modifications) and is legally compliant, and therefore that the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum, the Council has limited options in how to respond. The options are as follows:

 

Option 1: Act upon the conclusions in the Examiner’s Report, including making any recommended modifications to the Neighbourhood Plan, and proceed to referendum, provided that the Council confirms that the Basic Conditions have been met.

 

Option 2: Take a decision substantially different from the Examiner’s conclusions, wholly or partly as a result of new evidence or fact, or a different view is taken by the Council as to a particular fact, including that the Council is unable to confirm that the Basic Conditions have been met.

 

16. National regulations require the Council to make a decision on the Examiner’s Report and whether the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum within 5 weeks of receipt of the report (unless an alternative longer timescale is agreed with the Parish Council). Officers have been working with the Parish Council and a longer timescale has been agreed to ensure that there is agreement between the two councils to all the proposed changes that are included in the referendum version of the plan.

 

17. Officers have concluded that Option 1 should be followed for the reasons set out in the following paragraphs of this decision statement. Officers agree with the examiner’s conclusions, including his recommended modifications to the Neighbourhood Plan, and agree that the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum.

 

a. Meeting the Basic Conditions and Legal Requirements

 

18. To successfully proceed through its examination to a referendum, a Neighbourhood Plan must meet a number of tests known as the ‘Basic Conditions’. The Basic Conditions are set out in national planning regulations and are summarised as follows:

·         having regard to national policies and advice contained in guidance issued by the Secretary of State it is appropriate to make the Neighbourhood Plan.

·         the making of the Neighbourhood Plan contributes to the achievement of sustainable development.

·         the Neighbourhood Plan is in general conformity with the strategic policies contained in the development plan for the area.

·         the making of the Neighbourhood Plan does not breach, and is otherwise compatible with, EU obligations; and

·         prescribed conditions are met in relation to the Neighbourhood Plan, including that the making of the neighbourhood plan is not likely to have a significant effect on a European wildlife site or a European offshore marine site either alone or in combination with other plans or projects.

 

The Council’s Neighbourhood Planning Toolkit includes Guidance Note 11 (What are the Basic Conditions and How to Meet Them), which sets out further details on each of the Basic Conditions. 

 

19. To proceed to a referendum, a Neighbourhood Plan must also meet a number of legal requirements, such as whether the Neighbourhood Plan has been prepared by a qualifying body and meets the definition and scope of a Neighbourhood Plan.

 

20. The examiner concludes in the Main Findings - Executive Summary (page 4 of his report) and paragraphs 4.7; 4.9; 4.13 and 5.1-5.2 of his report that subject to a series of recommended modifications the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan meets the Basic Conditions and all the necessary legal requirements. The examiner’s recommended modifications do not fundamentally change the role or purpose of the Neighbourhood Plan; they have been recommended by the examiner to provide clarity and precision.

 

21. Officers, in conjunction with Histon & Impington Parish Council, have reviewed the examiner’s conclusions and recommended modifications, and officers and the Parish Council have agreed each of the recommended modifications considered necessary by the examiner for the Neighbourhood Plan to meet the Basic Conditions. A ‘For Referendum’ version of the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan has been prepared including these modifications (see Appendix 2).

 

22. Additional non-material modifications to the Neighbourhood Plan have also been prepared by officers and agreed with Histon & Impington Parish Council, and these additional modifications are also included in the ‘For Referendum’ version of the Neighbourhood Plan (see Appendix 2). These modifications have been made in accordance with guidance set out in national planning guidance[2] which states that minor (non-material) updates to a Neighbourhood Plan that would not materially affect the policies in the plan can be made by the District Council at any time, provided they have the consent of the Parish Council, and that these modifications can be made without the need for consultation or examination.

 

23. In summary, these additional non-material modifications include the following:

·         Updates to Chapters 1 to reflect current stage of the Neighbourhood Plan

·         Updates where the Histon & Impington Village Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) is mentioned to acknowledge its current status – it is anticipated that this SPD will be adopted by the council this year.

·         Updates within Chapter 5 regarding the current planning permission at the School Hill site and the new school under construction at Buxhall Farm.

   

24. Officers have undertaken a Basic Conditions and Legal Compliance check of the ‘For Referendum’ version of the Neighbourhood Plan (see Appendix 3) and consider that the Neighbourhood Plan meets all the requirements.

 

25. As the modifications made to the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan do not change the essence of its planning policies, the SEA and HRA screening undertaken on a draft version of the Neighbourhood Plan in September 2018, and the screening determination published in October 2018 remain valid.

 

b. Referendum

 

26. The examiner concludes in the Executive Summary and paragraphs 5.1 -5.2 of his report that, subject to the incorporation of his recommended modifications, the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum. He also concludes that it is appropriate for the referendum area to be the neighbourhood area designated by SCDC in September 2014.

 

27. The examiner’s conclusions on the referendum area are consistent with that proposed by the Council in its response on the submission version of the Neighbourhood Plan agreed by the Lead Cabinet Member for Planning in July 2019. Therefore as it has been demonstrated by officers that the ‘For Referendum’ version of the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan meets all the legislative requirements, officers concur with the examiner that the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum and that the referendum area should be the neighbourhood area. 

 

28. There have been recent changes to the national regulations regarding neighbourhood plans and their referendums. Previously it was set out that where it is concluded that the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum that the referendum should take place within 56 working days of the day after the publication of this decision statement. However regulations linked to the Coronavirus Act 2020 mean that no elections or referendums can take place until 6 May 2021. This includes neighbourhood plan referendums. A referendum for the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan cannot therefore take place until after May 2021.

 

29. The government is aware that communities, like those in Histon & Impington parish, having worked on their neighbourhood plans for some considerable time will want their plans to come into force as soon as possible. With this in mind, the government have updated current planning guidance to set out that neighbourhood plans awaiting referendums can be given significant weight in decision-making. This will be the case for Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan once it is agreed that it can proceed to referendum. 

 

30.  If a Neighbourhood Plan is successful at referendum, the Neighbourhood Plan becomes part of the development plan for the area[3], although the formal ‘making’ of the Neighbourhood Plan will not happen until SCDC’s full Council are asked to do this at their next meeting following the referendum.

 

Next Steps

 

31. The council will now have to wait until neighbourhood plan referendums can take place. The government has indicated that it will keep under review the current regulations and may amend or revoke them in response to changing circumstances. The Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan will be able to proceed to referendum once these are permitted to take place.

 

Implications

 

32. In the writing of this report, taking into account financial, legal, staffing, risk management, equality and diversity, climate change, community safety and any other key issues, the following implications have been considered:

 

33. Financial: the costs of the examination and referendum have to be initially met by SCDC. However, the Council can claim a £20,000 government grant per Neighbourhood Plan once it has been through the examination and the Council has issued a decision statement detailing its intentions to send the plan to referendum. This is a change due to the Coronavirus pandemic as previously the Council could only claim the grant once a date was set for the referendum.  The Council can therefore now claim this government grant in the next claims period.

 

34. Legal: where the examiner has concluded that the Neighbourhood Plan is legally compliant, meets the Basic Conditions (with or without modifications), and should proceed to referendum, the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development has delegated authority to make the decision on the way forward, in consultation with the Planning Lead Member (as agreed by Cabinet at its meeting on 26 July 2018). National regulations and planning guidance for Neighbourhood Plans require that the Council considers the conclusions of the Examiner’s Report, and whether those conclusions should be acted upon and therefore that the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to referendum. This includes considering whether the examiner’s recommended modifications to the Neighbourhood Plan should be made, and whether the Council agrees that the Neighbourhood Plan meets the Basic Conditions. The Council’s decision must be published in a decision statement.

 

35. Staffing: the responsibilities associated with delivering neighbourhood planning are being undertaken within the existing resources of the Planning Policy Team, drawing upon the expertise of other staff as required.

 

36. Equality and Diversity: these issues have been considered in the preparation of the Neighbourhood Plan, as to meet the Basic Conditions a Neighbourhood Plan must not breach, and is otherwise compatible with, EU obligations, including Human Rights. An assessment has been undertaken by Histon & Impington Parish Council to examine the impact of the Neighbourhood Plan policies on persons who have a ‘protected characteristic’ and this assessment concludes that the Neighbourhood Plan will not result in negative effects on persons who have a ‘protected characteristic’ and that there may be positive impacts on persons with a ‘protected characteristic’

 

https://www.scambs.gov.uk/media/13452/hinp-equalities-impact-assessment-may-2019.pdf

That the Joint Director for Planning and Economic Development, having consulted with the Planning Lead Member, agrees:

a.    that South Cambridgeshire District Council should act upon the conclusions in the Examiner’s Report on the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan (see Appendix 1) and that the Neighbourhood Plan should proceed to a referendum when permitted by the national regulations.

b.    the ‘for referendum’ version of the Histon & Impington Neighbourhood Plan (as set out in Appendix 2);

c.     the ‘for referendum’ version of the Histon & Impington Plan be given significant weight in decision making and

d.    that the area for the referendum should be the Neighbourhood Area.