The Committee refused the application for the reasons set out in the report from the Head of Development Management.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director, and two additional Conditions requiring a minimum on-site parking layout, and the placement of bollards to the front of the property in order to prevent on-street parking.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the Outline application (as amended) subject to the prior completion of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, securing appropriate developer contributions that are compliant with Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations, the Conditions referred to in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director, and presentation, in due course, of the Reserved Matters application for determination by the Planning Committee.
The Committee refused the application for the reasons set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director, Reason 1 being expanded to clarify the extent to which the proposal conflicted with Policy ST/1 of the Local Development Framework 2007, relating to the Green Belt.
The Committee refused the application, contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director. Members agreed the reasons for refusal as being that no very special circumstances had been demonstrated for the development that would clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and other harm from coalescence
The Committee refused the application, contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director. Members agreed the reasons for refusal as being:
1. Inappropriate development in the Green Belt
2. Other harm through visual impact that would adversely affect the residential amenity of North Farmhouse, and lead to coalescence through encroachment into land that separates the villages of Sawston and Babraham
3. no very special circumstances have been demonstrated that would clearly outweigh the harm to the Green Belt through inappropriateness and other harm.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee was minded to give officers delegated powers to approve the application subject to
1. Reconsideration of ecology and access issues (including access from the A1307) in consultation with Parish Councils and local Members representing Sawston and Babraham.
2. Further consideration of the environmental impact, including from lighting on site;
3. Safeguarding Conditions and, if appropriate, the prior completion of a Legal Agreement under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990; and
4. The application being referred to the Secretary of State as a Departure from the Development Plan and not being called in for determination by him.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the applications subject to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee refused the application for the reasons set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions and Informatives set out in the report from the Planning and New Communities Director.
The Committee approved the application as amended by drawing number 012/397-1a date stamped 23 March 2012, subject to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee resolved to make an Order under Section 257 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 diverting Public Footpath number 18 in Sawston between Mill Lane and The Baulks (Footpath number 20), and to ask officers to arrange for the appropriate Notices to be published in order that the Order can be confirmed in due course, thus enabling the development proposed by planning application S/2435/07/F to take place.
The Committee was Minded to Approve the application, subject to it being referred to the Secretary of State as a departure from the Development Plan and not called in by him for determination, to the prior completion of a Section 106 Legal Agreement requiring the site to be occupied as a single planning unit and to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities), Condition 9 being slightly amended to read as follows:
“9. No development shall take place until there has been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority a plan indicating the positions, design, materials and type of boundary treatment to be erected. The boundary treatment shall be completed prior to development commencing on site in accordance with the approved details and shall thereafter be retained.
(Reason - In the interests of safeguarding the amenities of the occupiers of neighbouring properties in accordance with Policies DP/2 and DP/3 of the adopted Local Development Framework 2007.)””
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions and Informatives set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application subject to the suitability of the revised site plan and to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee approved the application as amended by plans date stamped 17 September 2010, subject to the Conditions set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities) and to an extra Condition requiring the details of construction.
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee approved the application subject to the Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and New Communities).
The Committee resolved to delete Condition 26 from planning permission S/1319/08/F.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to refuse the application, contrary to the recommendation in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities), subject to officers seeking and receiving independent highways advice supporting Members’ concerns about traffic safety (should the independent highways advice not be supportive, then Members instructed officers to prepare a further report for determination by Planning Committee). Members voiced concern at the application’s environmental impact.
The Committee approved the application subject to a revised layout plan and the Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities) (Condition 8 of S/0854/09/F and Condition 9 of S/085/09/LB being reworded). Boundary treatment condition also added.
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application, subject to comments from the Council’s Landscape Officer and Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities).
The Committee gave officers delegated powers to approve the application, subject to comments from the Council’s Landscape Officer and Conditions referred to in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities).
Approved as report with an additional Condition requiring that the surface of the car parking spaces consist of a permeable material
Delegated Approval as per officers’ amended recommendation, subject to Conditions relating to boundary noise levels, acoustic fencing, operating hours, other noise attenuation measures, an appropriate lighting scheme, a limit on HGV movements, the routing of lorries, and a restricting on the location of opening doors.
Deferred to allow consideration of comments, when received, from the Local Highways Authority. Delegated refusal if those comments have not been received by 31 October 2008.
Deferred to allow consideration of comments, when received, from the Local Highways Authority. Delegated refusal if those comments have not been received by 31 October 2008.
Delegated approval as report, with extra Conditions (if appropriate) relating to bird boxes, traffic measures, visibility splays, water conservation and parking.
Approved contrary to recommendation on the grounds of the proposal not being overbearing, and there being no loss of light to the neighbouring property at 23 Granta Road.
Approved contrary to report – Members considered the proposal to be acceptable given its context and lack of any harm to the character of the area.
Approved as report with extra conditions relating to the accommodation of construction traffic, and requirement for a method statement about the retention and enhancement of the wall.
Approved as report with an extra Condition limiting the number of forklift trucks onsite and removing audible, reversing indicators.
Delegated approval / refusal subject to the nature of comments from the Local Highways Authority.
Deferred for one month pending the receipt of comments from the Local Highways Authority.
Approved as report.
Approval as report.
Following the receipt of a suitably amended site plan and ownership certificate, approval as report.
Delegated approval, subject to the receipt of an amended plan making provision for vehicular access to the site, for the reasons set out in the report and subject to the Conditions referred top therein. Withdrawal of the extant Enforcement Notice.
Delegated Approval, as amended by drawing number 06/1155:010A date stamped 12 February 2007, for the reasons set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities), subject to a Deed of Variation (if required) relating to the Section 106 Legal Agreement dated 13 September 2005 and to the Conditions referred to therein.
Delegated Approval for the reasons set out in the report from the Corporate Manager (Planning and Sustainable Communities), subject to the Conditions referred to therein.
Approved as report.
Approved as report, with additional Conditions relating to drainage and contaminated land.
Approved subject to parking plan date stamped 23 November 2006.
REFUSED, contrary to the recommendation contained in the report, on the grounds that: by virtue of the additional activity at the premises until 11.00pm (Tuesdays-Sundays) resulting from the proposed delivery service, the proposal would seriously harm the amenity of local residents; that the use of the proposed parking area for delivery drivers would detract from the setting of the Queens Head, a Grade II listed building; and that inadequate information had been submitted as to whether or not additional plant and equipment, which could harm the fabric, and / or character, of the listed building, would be required.
APPROVAL for the reason set out in the report, subject to the Condition referred to therein.
Councillor Mrs SA Hatton declared a personal and prejudicial interest by virtue of being one of the applicants, withdrew from the Chamber, did not contribute to the debate and did not vote.
Councillor Dr DR Bard declared a personal interest by virtue of being acquainted with one of the applicants, namely Councillor Mrs SA Hatton. The Chairman noted, for the record, that this applied to every Member then present in the Chamber.
Delegated approval / refusal. The application would be approved for the reasons set out in the report from the Director of Development Services, subject to the Condition referred to therein and to the satisfactory conclusion of negotiations aimed at addressing Members’ concerns about the design of the lamps, their hours of use, and the issue of light pollution.
Approval for the reasons set out in the report from the Director of Development Services, subject to the Conditions reeferred to therein.
APPROVAL
APPROVAL
APPROVAL
DELEGATED APPROVAL
DELEGATED APPROVAL
APPROVAL
Delegated refusal of both applications.
APPROVAL
Minded to Approve for the reasons referred to in paragraph 2 of the report, subject to the application not being called in for determination by the Secretary of State.
Temporary Approval for 12 months for the reasons, and subject to the Conditions, referred to in the report.
Refused contrary to report. Reasons: inadequate parking, and inability to accommodate soft landscaping at the same time as wheeled bin access along the western boundary. Members had visited the site.
Delegated approval
Delegated Approval / Refusal
Approval
Deferred
Minded to Approve
Delegated approval
Refused
Delegated Approval subject to confirmation that the turning head is acceptable.
Approval as report but with no Decision Notice being issued until the expiry of 3 weeks or until the developers and Sawston Parish Council have concluded their negotiations over the extent of the commuted sum on offer for providing the pedestrian crossing whichever is the sooner.
Approval contrary to report. Reasons: proportionate to dwelling and does not adversely affect the Green Belt.
Deferred for specialist advice
Delegated approval / Delegated Refusal subject to the road being to adoptable standard, being accessible by Refuse Vehicles and consideration of an element of key worker housing.
Delegated approval, subject to resolution of safety concerns and consideration whether Paramedic Garage is properly to be determined as part of this RM application.
Approval with additional condition relating to hours of work of any unit used fro Light Industrial purposes.
Deferred for a site visit
Delegated Approval
Deferred for information from Local Highways Authority and comments from Little Shelford Parish Council
Approval contrary to report
Delegated refusal/approval
Approval as report
Approval as report
Approval contrary to report
Approval (no longer delegated as report)